mathematical analysis malik arora pdf merge

This book discusses real sequences and series, continuity, functions of several variables, elementary and implicit functions, Riemann and Riemann-Stieltjes integrals, and Lebesgue integrals.

In any given month, the range of new books hitting the shelves can be frankly astonishing.

For the dedicated reader, part of the thrill of.

Read more. 11 likes 0 comments.

A main concern with the products was lack of data on the safety of the ingredients in the e-cigarette solution, especially the safety of repeated inhalation of a heated mixture of propylene glycol and other chemicals.

I just have a couple of additional remarks which you will find below or (in specific cases) in the document attached: Conclusion chapters sometimes present rather a discussion of the literature instead of clear conclusions: Moreover, they sometimes contain details of studies that would be better placed in the body of the text.

As pointed out by, the presentation of results should be more factual and consider the possibility of different interpretations (see specific comment on the interpretation of results of the Bullen et al.

Furthermore, the negotiations by the institutions on the proposal are still ongoing.

In that context, I was wondering if it is the purpose of the document to comment on legislative approaches (see also comments in the text) 2) For the document on smokeless tobacco, I introduced a couple of small comments, but didnt have the chance for a thorough reading.

It is indeed difficult to shorten the document to 50 pages if you wish that the regional sections should be kept as they are (they alone make up for about 50 pages).

However, I noted some duplication between the introduction (which contains summary and major conclusions) and the key findings chapter.

Some suggestions for changes: Extract the major conclusions out of the introductionkey findings and make a separate Executive summary Possibly concentrate the regional chapters to major findings and put the rest into an Annex (together with all the references).

Best regards, PS.

I will fly to Brazil already tomorrow (to take advantage of the occasion ).

Policy Officer, Tobacco Control Team European Commission DG SANCO (Health and Consumers) Unit D4 - Substances of human origin and Tobacco control F101 886 B-1049 BruxellesBelgium en.htm PLEASE NOTE THAT THE CONTENT OF THIS EMAIL INCLUDING ATTACHMENTS IS FOR YOUR PERSONAL USE ONLY From: hc-sc.gc.ca Sent: Saturday, November 09, 2013 1:23 AM To: Cc: (SANCO); (SANCO); Subject: Draft WHO Background Paper on ENDS (comments) Dear, Sorry for the late input.

General comments can be found in this e-mail, below, and more specific ones in the attached document.

From a science perspective, I would caution that interpretation of the literature is skewed toward a negative view of ecigarettes, and these conclusions are sometimes, but not always justified.

I think the science portion of the paper could be strengthened by objectively presenting pros and cons of ecigs.

The account of available literature is thorough, although I would suggest adding new studies as they emerge since this is quite an active field.

For example, the cytotoxicity paper by Farsalinos et al.

Int J Environ Res Public Health.

Oct 16;10(10):5146-62) merits mention in the discussion on this topic, but was published after this draft was written.

Much of the paper is opinion-based, and does not represent all possible interpretations.

I am not sure if this was the original intention of the document Were the authors perhaps asked to provide their personal opinions and not a thorough issue analysis Although not a scientific point, I note that Canada is not mentioned in the summary of global regulation, and it would be beneficial to describe the Canadian situation for completeness.

This leads to the point that not all ecigs contain nicotine, and it may be worth factoring this issue into the analysis more prominently.

Lastly, I would suggest a thorough edit of this document, as there are several typos, references under review that will need to be updated, etc.

See attached file: WHO Ecig Report 10-14-13 RACHELv2JM comments.doc).

The committee noted that there was very little published scientific evidence on the health effects of e-cigarettes, or their efficacy for smoking cessation (stated in TobReg Report 955)(World Health Organization 2009) and that there was not sufficient evidence to support the cessation and health claims made by companies and those in the public health community who were advocating e-cigarettes for harm reduction.

E-cigarettes may hinder protection from exposure to tobacco smoke (Article 8) because, while e-cigarettes emit less air pollution into the environment than conventional cigarettes, they still subject bystanders to passive vaping.

E-cigarettes are widely advertised and promoted (often inaccurately) as being exempt from clean indoor air laws.

In addition, the similar appearance of people using e-cigarettes and those using conventional cigarettes can complicate enforcement of restrictions on smoking conventional cigarettes.

In addition, the e-cigarette vapor has not been proven safe for inhalation by bystanders.

Mathematical Analysis Malik Arora Pdf Merge